Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sense of Purpose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sense of Purpose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cites no sources, fails WP:BAND DirtyHarry991 (talk) 07:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Arts, Music, and Australia. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 07:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unable to find any coverage. Article cites no sources, the only outside links are to a Myspace page (seriously?) and a dead website, and I'm unable to find any others than a Bandcamp page (primary source so not reliable). Doesn't meet WP:BAND or WP:GNG as per nomination. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.