Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ServerHub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In line with the established custom, those contributions from unregistered users and users with limited contributions outside the topic have been given less weight. Stifle (talk) 13:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ServerHub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A substantial challenge has been mounted to a speedy nomination. I think that a discussion is in order. My own feeling is that notability is not shown, but this was not strong enough to speedily delete. Peridon (talk) 13:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep They have their own ASN number of AS30693. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.251.149.1 (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - How does this support Wikipedia notability? reddogsix (talk) 19:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because sources like AzCentral, Inc, Pingzine magazine provide evidence of notability Rohips (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The Ping article is hardly non-trivial support for the organisation - it really is a PR to tout being 400+ on the INC list. The AzCentrial is just a line listing of the company. reddogsix (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I wouldn't consider the Ping article to be a PR, it's based off an actual physically printed magazine issue interviewing the CEO, Issue #75 http://issuu.com/pingzine/docs/pz_issue74 Rohips (talk) 18:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That link takes me (after getting rid of an irritating popup thing) to a picture of a magazine cover. Peridon (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's Digital Version of the magazine, should have page numbers, article was on page 24/25 Rohips (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No numbers as I see it. There's an i in a circle, which takes me to an advert, and some incomprehensible symbols at top right. One is a +, which I take to be an invitation to add something or 'like' it. I don't have Flash - perhaps that's it, but I usually get a warning. Peridon (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's flash based, here is a screenshot of what you'd see http://i.imgur.com/7oaPJmY.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohips (talk • contribs) 20:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Strange to be saying this, but this seems like a WP:ROTM hosting provider to me. Sources are passing mentions and press releases... Don't see notability right now. -- BenTels (talk) 15:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails to show notability. reddogsix (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because Although the sources vary in quality depth and coverage they provide enough evidence to meet the notability guidelines, Significant coverages and sources to provide evidence so that No external research was done on my part Reliability and integrity of the sources were checked Independent of subject./ Desertsun84 (talk) 18:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC) — Desertsun84 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.