Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Servtrans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 14:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Servtrans

Servtrans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell this company no longer exists - if it is notable historically then sources should be added Chidgk1 (talk) 15:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: there doesn't seem to be any indication that the company is particularly notable. Darron4 (talk) 16:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Servtrans, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.