Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Adkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article needs some sources quick, as the grandfather clause may be removed soon. (non-admin closure) J947 19:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Adkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently a minor actor that has received no coverage in reliable secondary sources and therefore fails Biographies of living persons and GNG Steve Quinn (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have articles of (former) child actors known for only 1-2 roles so why should we delete this article of an actor with multiple Movie and TV roles? --Denniss (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 05:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Adkins, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.