Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven dirty words

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Seven dirty words (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again, should not be published in public domain. It is content not suitable for an encyclopedia. Introductionneeded (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- See WP:DEL#REASON. Per #14 there, see WP:NOTCENSORED. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. And strongly advise that Introductionneeded reads the Wikipedia:Deletion policy before nominating any more articles. Wikipedia doesn't delete articles because they contain subject matter that somebody doesn't like. Nominations like this just waste everyone's time. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Proposal is not policy-based. Wikipedia is not censored. CentreLeftRight 21:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 01:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 01:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 01:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fine it can be kept up, does not need to be deleted.Introductionneeded (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven dirty words, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.