Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex with reference to the Quran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sex with reference to the Quran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay composed largely of Original research/synthesis and redundant to Islamic sexual jurisprudence. A merger was proposed some months ago, but most comments were in favour of deleting. - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A merger should be done when there is something to salvage. This is complete OR. I am not sure if there is anything salvageable here. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 20:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is really a very blatant example of good intentioned OR. There really isn't much more to add; it should be an open and shut case. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ِDelete: Looks like a conference article. It's WP:OR entirely and does not pass WP:GNG. Mhhossein (talk) 05:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ِDelete Agree with the above. We've got a better article on the subject already. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Islamic sexual jurisprudence which is a better developed article on exactly the same subject. I have no objection to merging anything useful there, if there is anything. --Sammy1339 (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.