Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaharsree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. The article appears to meet WP:GEOLAND and has been cleaned up to establish that. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 04:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shaharsree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable that would justify inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- Dane2007 ^talk 02:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's nothing notable here, and with talk about "aristocratic families" living there with mentions of non-notable people it smells of WP:PROMO. Kbabej (talk) 03:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:GEOLAND. It does appear to be a population center [1] and it is a government recognized village. [2]. Article could use some wiki copyediting. --Oakshade (talk) 05:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as WP:GEOLAND holds all population centres to be inherently notable. Needs a drastic cleanup for tone which I'll undertake myself right now. A Train^talk 08:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Per the cleanup by A Train, I think it now is acceptable. They've removed the obvious promo. Kbabej (talk) 18:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND, a legally recognised place, see Population & Housing Census 2011 Community Report: Maulvibaza (page 93). Coolabahapple (talk) 12:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.