Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahram Izadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shahram Izadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable computer scientist. Sources cited are primary and/or offer only passing mentions. Search finds more of the same, as well as the usual social media etc. mentions, but nothing contributing towards notability. Fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Google Scholar gives an h-index of 88 (in a highly topical buzz field), in case that has any bearing on academic notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. I had left a message on the creator's page asking for them to declare their COI. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Could find nothing on newspapers.com extended. BBQboffin (talk) 00:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.