Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shai Benbasat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I see a consensus that the coverage on this article subject doesn't reach SIGCOV although this isn't a unanimous opinion. No additional comments after relisting so I'm closing this discussion now. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shai Benbasat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable streamer, there is some coverage in the Jerusalem Post article cited, but that's about all there is for this individual. Not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A shame so many sources are there in Hebrew meeting reliable Source guidelines, this seems to sufficiently sourced. Passes WP:Sigcov. Maliner (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Of the sources used in the article, the Post article isn't significantly about Benbasat (only mentioned with a dozen other streamers). I don't think the Frog.co.il source is reliable—it looks like a blog-style tabloid focused on teens that started up only a decade ago. The Ynet source may be enough coverage, but I'm likewise unsure of its reliability (can't even find a masthead or editorial policy on their English-language site.) That leaves the Mako as the only one that's enough for a GNG pass, and that's falling short of the multiple sources we require. My ability to search Hebrew sources is weak, but there's nothing in English I can find that suggests they are notable or there are sources beyond what's provided. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 23:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Hebrew searches concludes he was also a voice actor in The Super Mario Bros. Movie official hebrew dub WP:FILMBIO, also ynet sources looks decent for GNG but added voice acting seems weak to solid keep. Gerblinpete (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [reply]
Checkuser note: Gerblinpete is a confirmed sock of Meegvun, below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per fuchs rationale. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 13:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient independent SIGCOV. gidonb (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes WP:Sigcov. Maliner (talk) 16:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:Three. Frogi [he] , Mako (website) and Ynet are reputed news portal of Israel. Significant coverage in these publications are enough to address WP:GNG. Meegvun (talk) 20:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NinjaRobotPirate: Hi Ninja, Can you please have a look at this disruption. This afd is clearly a mess. Maliner (talk) 04:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. JPost is a passing mention and frogi.co.il is essentially a repost of the video (90%+ of it is quoting him, and the other 10% is useless). That leaves Ynet and Mako, which are both probably RSs and unquestionably the primary topic. Since it's all not in English, it's pretty hard to find sources. But the quantity right now isn't meeting SIGCOV. SWinxy (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Sources are not in English that does not mean that article should be deleted. See WP:NEXIST. Maliner (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ynet, Mako, and Frogi are clearly independent and reliable sources discussing the subject in detail. Sufficient to pass Sigcov. Maliner (talk) 17:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: some sock free time would be lovely
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.