Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalu Rahim
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 11:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Shalu Rahim
- Shalu Rahim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musician – Nixinova ⟨T|C⟩ 20:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep more notable as an actor, has leading role in an upcoming film, coverage in Hindu and Decclan Chronicle Atlantic306 (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not notable as a musician or an actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies and significant RS coverage not found. WP:NACTOR and WP:MUSIC fail; promo tone and apparent intent. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- [1] and [2] might not make significant coverage, but it certainly isn't a complete lack of coverage (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 03:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.