Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shankar Shesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 00:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shankar Shesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources show that he had written as the count shows in the article. Not much in the searches. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. First, the nom does not make any argument for deletion, just that the factual content of the article may be a problem - and while I cannot verify the 10 novels, the cited source does confirm 22 plays. Second, subject seems notable (in-depth coverage, won some awards). At most, I can see this tagged with {{verification failed}}, but deletion discussion is the wrong venue. I recommend speedy keep since the nominator did not make any valid arguments for deletion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. Just because the nominator does not know the writer in question, does not mean the article is deleteworthy. Nominator must come up with a proof that the writer is not a known figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourabhpaul1986 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.