Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanthi Baliga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus to delete following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shanthi Baliga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While her volunteer work is admirable, she is not notable.Some minor coverage of her but she just isn't notable Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No coverage in reliable sources and the awards she has won are too small to warrant notability. Opencooper (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:N and falls into the category of WP:NOT as the article is more of a resume. Pmedema (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as there is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to show notability. /wiae /tlk 21:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as there is some information there but perhaps nothing better convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.