Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Jose Rodrigues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Slight WP:IAR and closing this two days early due to zero opposition, plus disruption on the article itself by the creator (despite being blocked once for it). Primefac (talk) 16:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Jose Rodrigues

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biographical article which does not demonstrate notability of the subject. Extensive research online does not reveal any evidence that the subject meets the notability requirements for academics, nor meets the general notability criteria. Current references are a second author credit on one scientific paper and an abstract for a conference. There's also no evidence their work is itself notable which could indicate the possibility of the subject also being notable, or an alternative avenue for the author to pursue. The original drafts were deleted for their promotional content, the version nominated was sufficiently pared down to not be speedily deletable. Nick (talk) 22:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't think that the argument that it has not been given time to improve is valid here. If we made a Wikipedia page about Bill Gates that just said "Bill Gates is a businessman", it wouldn't get deleted. Why? Because he passes WP:GNG and someone would find a source, etc., etc. I don't think this person passes WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. I may be wrong, and it may be a good idea to move to draft if someone can find some references that are independent and reliable to support the General Notability Guidelines. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 22:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero impact on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Complete non-notable. A couple of technical papers published and an award from his undergraduate school. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Another lengthy, OR-filled, SPA-created article on an individual who does not pass standard WP:N guidelines. Agricola44 (talk) 13:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.