Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shebin Backer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus of policy-based arguments DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shebin Backer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references here which are independent (which are not all of them) only mention the subject in passing, offering no discussion. The creator, though not an SPA, is a very new editor. Subject has not won any national or regional awards, no viable evidence of notability found. KDS4444 (talk) 12:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is having required notability, if we look for reliable sources also (provided on the article), its providing required evidences on search results. Further this is not a new editor account ...Captain......Tälk tö me... 13:22, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I meant "new" in the sense of having made very few edits (<700), not "new" in the chronological sense. Apologies for that. Second, simply asserting that the subject is notable is not enough to make him notable: the first block of references provided within the article are directory listings, which are considered WP:ROUTINE information, and the rest only cover the subject WP:TRIVIALLY. No evidence has been provided of the subject's notability so far, and a Google search turns up Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and then a list of more trivial mentions as a director or producer, several of which look like they might also lack independence from the subject and none of which contains discussion of him (as best I could tell). This article needs references to non-trivial discussion of the subject in reliable, independent, secondary sources in order to establish his notability. I did not find such. If anyone can do so, please feel free. KDS4444 (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is a film producer and specifically what kind of Web finding we have to look for the subject as per the policy. Subject have an IMDB page and established as producer (as per the evidences available). I will further look for more deeper online search (have seen print articles on the subject with main focus) but prints are not online, Please move the article to my namespace, if its gets deleted on the above rules. Will re-enter with adequate details, Respecting WP:OSE - ...Captain......Tälk tö me... 18:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete GNG not met. Sources I could find are all passing mentions or PR. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Passing mentions, minor non-notable awards, not meeting WP:CREATIVE. --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 04:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.