Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheesh Ram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural delete. G5. Created by a sock. Further reading: this SPI. (non-admin closure) —usernamekiran(talk) 00:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh Ram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. Sheldybett (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. @Sheldybett: Did you do WP:BEFORE? Every member or former member of a state or national legislature is considered notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes WP:NPOL as a member of a state legislature.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:NPOL Atlantic306 (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Members of state legislatures pass WP:NPOL #1 right on its face. Yes, the article needs improvement, but we judge inclusion by the existence of appropriate sources, not just the current quality of the article — so if a person has a clean pass of our notability standards for politicians, as a holder of a role that does get press coverage, then we do not delete the article just for not already being in better shape: we keep it, and just tag it for referencing improvement. Bearcat (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Article has been G5 deleted outside of AfD due to the creator being in a SPI; also a likely copyvio. Nate • (chatter) 19:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.