Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheldon Richman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sheldon Richman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

wp:promotion all of the sources are Sheldon himself Darkstar1st (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i redirected to the notable publication and was reverted without explaination [1] Darkstar1st (talk) 04:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note Original nominator had added above material to previous AfD page. I've moved it here where it belongs. I'm neutral on the nomination itself. --Finngall ^talk 14:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He has contributed to a broad range of journals and he is cited often enough. One generally has limited biographical information on scholars. Jason from nyc (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 23:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete The article shows he has published many articles in his own group's journals, and nothing more. DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:21, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.