Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelf Awareness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shelf Awareness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been around for three years yet the references don't add up to notability. Discounting the several own web-site refs , almost all the rest are very peripheral mentions. The most likely candidate - Frank Reagan, Books make a difference appears to be a press release with company contacts posted at the end. I don't see notability here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I located this interview Geekwire, and the publication is cited often in book related news. It appears t be somewhat noted in the book publishing world. Borderline, but I'm leaning keep. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep it seems to be a significant newsletter in its trade. DGG ( talk ) 17:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.