Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sherline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like an advertisement and does not cite any sources that are not connected to the subject. I could not find any in-depth discussion of the company by reliable, independent sources. Omnigrade (talk) 02:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete - agree with nom. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Lack of reliable sources with significant coverage. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 09:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.