Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherweb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sherweb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO. DrStrauss talk 19:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable company: sourcing is either not independent or trivial mentions, and none of the awards are generally big enough to be considered notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, references do not convince me of notability for this company. PK T(alk) 19:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.