Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shift.ms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shift.ms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable charity and social network. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is mostly self-promotions and executive quotes. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by an account currently indef blocked for undisclosed paid editing; pls see Special:Contributions/Bigredlighthouse. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The original author being blocked for promotion would not be an ongoing issue if the subject was notable and other editors had developed the article since its creation but, checking the history, I see that nobody else seems to care about this subject. The article is very close to being an orphan. The charity has only 8 alleged staff. Its website seems to suggest that its only activity is the operation of a very small specialist online social network. Even if we might be inclined to give a charity more benefit of the doubt than a for-profit company, this is not notable. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 01:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete Fails the GNG. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.