Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shihab S. Asfour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shihab S. Asfour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

University professor. A search found only social media profiles and non-independent mentions. Not nearly enough coverage to meet the requirements at WP:GNG. Most of the article is WP:LISTCRUFT. Omni Flames (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is essentially just a cv, and neither his Google scholar citation counts nor his administrative position are enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep GS h-index of 19 in reasonable well-cited field maybe just over the line. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete as still enough questionability to suggest deletion is best here. SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I don't believe he passes WP:PROF. — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 22:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.