Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Braha (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Braha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Media personality with extremely superficial coverage. (Sorry, didn't notice the 2 prior AfDs until now, but I having now looked again I still think the coverage's not there.) EEng (talk) 17:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marnie (dog), owned by the subject. There's a distinct whiff of strained promotionalism here. EEng (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A very borderline keep, on the basis of barely meeting criteria 3 set out in WP:CREATIVE (New York Noise) and WP:GNG for receiving coverage from local free newspapers. I am open to being convinced otherwise, especially if an American is able to better assess the quality of these sources. - Mailer Diablo 10:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.