Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shishir Kumar Shandilya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shishir Kumar Shandilya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see Shandilya passing any of the NPROF criteria (no google profile, but the h-index is below 10, the most cited paper has 57 citations), note that while IEEE fellows are notable IEEE senior members (requirements here (10 years experience, three references from other senior members or above)) are very much not. I don't see a GNG pass either. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link to google scholar profile added to article, does not come close to PROF C1.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Citation record not yet strong enough for WP:PROF#C1, and the minor awards and lower-level honorary membership levels listed in the article also aren't good enough for #C2 or #C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agree with nomination. FiddleheadLady (talk) 17:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per David Eppstein ,fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with nomination - hasn't got google profile - has written a book and about 40 articles?, none of which are cited very much. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per above. --hroest 21:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per David Eppstein and nom.4meter4 (talk) 16:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Masterhatch (talk) 06:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.