Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Parashar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted. Hoax based on content from Rahat Indori. Creator blocked as a suspected sock. utcursch | talk 22:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shiv Parashar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, indirect copyright violation; dishonest attempt by creator to modify Rahat Indori to fit the subject. Compare the above article mentioned with Special:Permalink/730110940, where the creator removed the G12 afterwards and basically removed some parts and added some fake information. Probably should be speedily deleted on an IAR basis for the dishonest copying by creator. — Esquivalience (talk) 03:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Should have been speedily deleted. David.moreno72 05:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. The article contains no credible assertion of significance, it fails to reference any significant secondary coverage, and I was unable to find any significant secondary coverage. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as above. The same editor created another article with similar problems which is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Pratapgarhi (Poet). Deli nk (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.