Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Visvanathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shiv Visvanathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently deproded by an ip. The rationale of the PROD was "Article of a minor academic & columnist. Non notable. Only sources are self published material from subject's empolyers.", which I agree with the nominator. Redtigerxyz ^Talk17:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A GS h-index of 15 gives a possible keep of WP:Prof#C1 for this public intellectual. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article caught my attention, when I found it included subject facebook page [[1]]. Then, when I read through the article. found it had been badly written and uses self published source of subject and his employer. Tried to find independent sources that talks about the the subject and was unable to find anything. If we can get independent sources that talk about this subject, we can keep with a complete rework of this article.Prodigyhk (talk) 10:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.