Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivdeep Lande

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shivdeep Lande

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough. Has a fan following in the Social Networking sites though! Uncletomwood (talk) 06:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has multiple newspaper appearances, so passing WP:GNG Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems like normal policing to me. Not particularly notable, despite the media coverage. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability has nothing to do with whether or not it's 'normal policing', as soon as there is in depth, independent coverage then its notable. In cases such as this, common sense suggests we probably do need extra to prove it. A quick google however found PatnaDaily, DailyMail United Kingdom, BiharPrabha, Sakaal Times, ZeeNews, Hindustan Times, India Today, Times of India, India Telegraph. JTdale. Together this constitutes Regional, Local, National and International media sources. ^Talk 02:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources listed by JTdale appear to exceed BASIC. --j⚛e decker ^talk 20:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article because its notable person... no good reason we delete.... and much coverage in newspapers, will be more in future... good for encyclopedia article 41.190.36.250 (talk) 10:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.