Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shredz Supplements

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:46, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shredz Supplements (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

declined prod. Fails WP:CORP. looks like an advert. LibStar (talk) 15:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I only found the one article about it, not counting their press releases. I doubt that multiple reliable sources are out there.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero | My Talk 05:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - Created and maintained by two WP:SPAs.LM2000 (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The sole reference merely quotes claims by the company founder and isn't a WP:RS. I'm not finding anything about the firm other than its trademark registration (filed July 2011, granted Aug 2012, as a query on start-up date has been flagged in the article). Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-Speedy Delete - Advert. Most of the "celebrity" spokespersons are redlinks.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an advertisement for a non-notable company. Alexius08 (talk) 23:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, promotional article on non-notable product. Article creator has also created Arvin Lal on company founder, at present PRODed as unsourced bio.TheLongTone (talk) 18:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete A pretty clear G11. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Press releases abound, but not finding reliable sources that provide significant coverage about the topic. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.