Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shui Feng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as a blatant hoax per WP:G3. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shui Feng

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 G3, need some help from someone literate in Chinese to see if this is actually real Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Looks like a badly-written hoax. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 11:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax. Alleged Chinese name is just feng shui. Chinese Wikipedia does not have an article on any author by this name. Reads like someone used Google Translate to make up Chinese-language quotes, particularly "你們是我寫故事的原因" (allegedly said to her husband, but uses the plural form of you). quant18 (talk) 12:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Obviously a hoax. I would have tagged it myself, but an IP already did so. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.