Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuvo Roy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  JGHowes  ^talk 01:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shuvo Roy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was incorrectly formatted. The reason for deletion give was : Reads like someone's personal resume. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 16:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 16:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 16:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 16:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Google Scholar indicates 20 papers with more than 100 citations each (highest are 1044, 461, 454) which, at least in my observations has been seen as sufficient to satisfy the 1st criteria for notability in WP:PROF in these sorts of cases. There is also some secondary coverage of the subject's in places like Nature News [1] and The San Francisco Chronicle [2]. MoneciousTriffid (talk) 21:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:PROF#C1 as above. This is somewhat {{like-resume}}, but not to the point where deletion is an appropriate remedy. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, google scholar profile has an h-index of 65, passing PROF C1.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, with that h-index, and citation count, passes WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.