Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidhika Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This discussion was instated by a sockpuppet, and another sockpuppet interfered with the discussion. Reviewing the comments, there is little argument strong enough for the article to be deleted, but nor are "keep" commenters particularly confident in their conclusions. As such, no consensus was achieved, and there is no prejudice against an editor in good standing nominating this for deletion in the future if they perform a proper WP:BEFORE (this is NPASR, but not a NOQUORUM close). (non-admin closure) — Bilorv (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sidhika Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sharma didn't act in any notable film in a significant role yet. The best role that she had was the supporting role in Paisa (2014 film). Fails to qualify as a notable actor following Wikipedia:ENTERTAINER. Di xiku 15:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:STRIKESOCK – The Grid (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Di xiku 15:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Di xiku 15:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Di xiku 15:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep my Google search finds multiple sources focusing on her acting career.[1], [2], [3]. Passes WP:GNG.Brayan ocaner (talk) 21:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep a lot of reference but most of them are not reliable source. Only Times of India, Tribune and National Herald are found to be a reliable source. 007sak (talk) 07:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant role yet - WP:TOOSOON.Advait (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:STRIKESOCK — Bilorv (talk) 21:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Note for closing admin: It looks like this was proposed by a sock that was banned on the same day. Given the votes are not a quorum, this article could be kept with the action taken similar to an expired PROD. – The Grid (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The Times of India, amongst several other newspapers now come in Yellow in the Afc, NPP script indicating they may be unreliable. The reason for this I think is the Paid news in India article which exposes the fact of these jounalists have been accepting payments to put a positive spin on the story. The whole industry is corrupt. Apart from that, she seems to be a bit part actor, who has been going for almost a decade and doesn't quality for WP:NACTOR. scope_creep^Talk 14:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.