Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Motors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Motors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I added a few references to the article. There are more to be found. I find that there is some notability and so therefore I !vote keep. Wm335td (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY. This article can be improved. VF9 (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Closing admin should observe that added sources are not WP:RS. Störm (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with nom, none of the references are good. I've checked for additional good sources but I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As of 19 November 2019, this article has The Express Tribune (newspaper), Asianet News and (3) other improved references. Today I updated and gave new references and before me (3) references were given by Wm335td above on 13 November 2019.Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:SIGCOV per the following sources including two peer reviewed journal articles:

1. Bartos, Frank (April 2003). Direct-Drive Linear Motion Lives!. Vol. 50(4). p. 34. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (peer reviewed)
2. Motoman - palletizing in the freezer. Vol. 30(6). December 1, 2003. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (peer reviewed)
3. UK keen to up trade links with Pakistan. June 15, 2012. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
4. Deputy high commissioner says UK committed to building trade ties with Pakistan. June 14, 2012. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
5. Saeedi, Tariq. HASCOL CHAIRMAN TALKS ABOUT BALOCHISTAN'S ENERGY POTENTIAL. p. 19-20. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
6. Mckie, David (May 24, 1995). Democracy can spare a few mediocre MPs. p. 15. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
7. Vasilash, Gary (November 1995). The first look: Motoman pushes the envelope of robot development. Vol. 107(11. p. 35. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)

Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.