Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signe Carstens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signe Carstens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not inherently notable therefore WP:GNG must be satisfied. I have analysed the sources currently presented in the article as well as those found in DDG, Google News and ProQuest and will present a source analysis below to explain why the sourcing does not satisfy GNG currently. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've searched in a few places but found nothing of value. Can you please share these sources showing detailed coverage? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signe Carstens, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.