Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Minter (miniminter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 22:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miniminter (entertainer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ENT. I couldn't find any secondary reliable sources for this person (except for an imdb page here - is that the same person?) to satisfy GNG, and definitely not enough sources to constitute that significant coverage exists (a requirement in order for GNG to be met). Hence, I am nominating this page for deletion through the AFD process. I think that this article has made a credible claim of significance, so I declined tagging it for A7 (other editors may feel differently though). I think that it's also worth noting that the article was created by copying the content from this draft, which has been rejected by the AFC team twice for lack of notability and reliable sources. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as simply none of this satisfies the current questionability for better solid notability, certainly none of the listed sources are better convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DrDevilFX (talk) 08:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.