Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simply Existing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simply Existing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Novel. Self-published, no holdings or significant reviews or coverage. Fails WP:NBOOKS. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unsourced nn self-published novel. --Rhododendrites (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:FreeRangeFrog's original Prod rationale: "No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. Self-published recent work." Fails all WP:NBOOK criteria. AllyD (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. This book just isn't notable. Self-published books can sometimes become notable, but it's very rare that they do. This one isn't one of those rare exceptions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.