Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinitus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sinitus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dead links mainly and no rs. New online search did not bring reliable sources; should be removed Cinder painter (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Switzerland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - if the company getting vaporized by regulators did not make the news, that's obviously demonstrates a total lack of notability. Brandon (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. Forget sigcov, there is not a single source on this company whatsoever. No hits in the NZZ, nothing in the Swiss newspaper archives besides one-line mentions in advertisements [1], and the best I get from a web search amounts to database entries. [2][3] Toadspike [Talk] 14:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.