Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sio-Iong Ao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sio-Iong Ao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns. Engineeringletters.com (as listed in the ref) is ranked at #4,902,405 on Alexa, showing it's not reliable at all. Other references (mainly theses) cannot be the sole evidences proving the notability of this person, and the links to some university websites look not satisfying. I tried to search around the web but no Chinese and English news reports or third-party introductions were found. Note: I've also started a deletion proposal in the Chinese Wikipedia out of the above reasons. It would be great if you can provide any reliable info directly showing "Sio-Iong Ao" is worth to be included in an Encyclopedia. Thanks. Kou Do u 11:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kou Do u 11:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 11:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Kou Do u 11:23, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. 180.172.239.231 (talk) 12:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 180.172.239.231 (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article and references suggest a scientist who has written a few scientific articles, developed some code and owns a business or two on the side. Nothing notable.--Rpclod (talk) 01:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:BASIC.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 11:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article focuses primarily on his academic rather than business accomplishments but notability under WP:PROF is not evident, and the article also does not present sources that could show notability as a businessman. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.