Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir C V Raman Institute of Technology and Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:RHaworth per WP:G5. (non-admin closure) Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir C V Raman Institute of Technology and Sciences

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, promotional material — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 10:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This nomination may be making a mountain out of a molehill. We do not need a seven-day process for a disruptive move of a draft by a probable block evader - see my comments here. Any admin could just delete the thing and restore the draft as it was prior to the move. - Sitush (talk) 10:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
NB: this will be a sock of Pv.abhinav - see User talk:Motospiff. - Sitush (talk) 10:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush:-I would like to say that I am not a sock of any person. From the next time please provide evidence while making such allegations — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also I have initiated this AFD because the last time I put a SD notice on such a page asking for an administrator to delete it my SD was declined on grounds that there was no such deletion criteria — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you were a sock, Force Radical. It is the article creator and mover who is socking. - Sitush (talk) 10:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails to satisfy corporate notability. . Where's the sockpuppet investigation? Until then, we do need this AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 11:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.