Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siroi Danmakukun (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Siroi Danmakukun

Siroi Danmakukun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not appear to be sufficient significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to suggest this passes the general notability guideline. SITH (talk) 12:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 12:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete: In addition to what you said, the article reads like an advertisement. WP:NOTADVERTISING No sources came up during my quick search. I see no reference to Japanese sources being ever found. Looking at that old discussion shows how much Wikipedia has changed, as they were defending it solely by how many hits Google brought up for it. Bluedude588 (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siroi Danmakukun (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.