Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirona Knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sirona Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite my best efforts WP:BEFORE I can't find any reliable secondary sourcing that covers the subject or her work extensively. Yes, she's published a lot of books, but, she fails WP:NAUTHOR and N:ACADEMIC - even WP:GNG.

Hopefully others can prove me wrong! Missvain (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing of significance on GS. I can't find any book reviews to pass WP:Author: maybe somebody else can. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]
• Comment I found a Publishers Weekly review of The Cyber Spellbook: Magick in the Virtual World , and at the Wikipedia Library, a 3-sentence bio published in 2000 by Baker & Taylor Author Biographies, a Publishers Weekly blurb review (Vol. 247, Issue 39, 2000) of Dream Magic: Night Spells and Rituals for Love, Prosperity, and Personal Power, mentions by Publishers Weekly of Celtic Druidism and A Witch Like Me (2001), a mention of Wiccan Spell a Day: 365 Spells, Charms, and Potions for the Whole Year in a Publishers Weekly article about the New Age publishing industry (Vol. 250, Issue 35, 2003), a blurb review in Publishers Weekly (Vol. 248, Issue 12, 2001) of Exploring Celtic Druidism: Ancient Magick and Rituals for Personal Empowerment, a listing of Empowering Your Life with Dreams in The Bookseller's (Issue 5118, 2004) Publications of the Week. On ProQuest, I found a 2001 article in The Arizona Republic ("BE(WITCH) MY VALENTINE 'MAGICK' BOOKS HELP YOU PUT LOVER UNDER A SPELL") that describes her as "an expert on Celtic shamanism, magick, witchcraft and the Goddess" and noting she published Dream Magic, with a few quotes from her, and a brief mention in a 2009 article from The Spokesman Review (BEYOND THE VEIL; At a Methow Valley festival, song, dance and teaching are tools for blurring the line between human, fairy realms) of her book The Complete Idiot's Guide to Elves and Fairies. Without more, I don't think this is enough to support WP:AUTHOR notability. Beccaynr (talk) 20:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your hard work. As there is nothing in-depth, I agree that passing mentions in trade journals (which exist to sell product) are not enough to support WP:Author. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Cheers, and I agree delete is appropriate at this time. Beccaynr (talk) 03:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.