Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiteHawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SiteHawk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- sourced to non RS for notability & WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:GNG. A Bloomberg company profile isn't enough for an article, and the other two articles are only a trivial mention of SiteHawk. --Hirsutism (talk) 01:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Listings and local small-business awards are insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH and my searches are not finding better than routine announcements. AllyD (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing significant Light2021 (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.