Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Star Mississippi 02:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sivak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Invalid disambig page: only 2 items, per WP:MOSDAB in such cases we use redirect (in this case to surname page) with hatnote to the second page Loew Galitz (talk) 03:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC) Withdrawn. Loew Galitz (talk) 22:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• No, we do not redirect from the basic title to a disambiguated title. The choices are:

1. Agree that the surname is the primary topic, move the surname page to Sivak (ther is already a hatnote there to point to the village)
2. Agree that the village is the primary topic, make Sivak into a redirect to it, add a hatnote there to point to the surname page.

• Move Sivak (surname) to Sivak, with the existing hatnote pointing to the village. PamD 09:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I object to the false premise, the manual of style does not actually say that, please see WP:2DAB. I don't see why there would be an assumption of primary topic for English readers here, both search strings seem no more plausible than the other, when someone searches for "Sivak". --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy close. Invalid AfD nomination. See Talk:Sivak (surname). -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.