Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyline Attractions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skyline Attractions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of article appears to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. The article is sourced almost entirely from the company's website - not a reason for deletion in itself - but that perhaps reflects the lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources. In the required WP:BEFORE, I noticed that the company may possibly be a subsidiary or subcontractor of Ride Entertainment Group - no prejudice to a WP:REDIRECT to that article. Otherwise, all the mentions of this company in google hits would seem to be those that would be expected of a "run of the mill" company: amusement park industry news, company listings and so on.
As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All sourcing from the company's website. Lacks independent, in-depth sources. A search shows a number of PR related items, but nothing to support inclusion into Wikipedia; however, I would support a redirect. reddogsix (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ivecos (t) 19:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Ivecos (t) 19:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:Corp; redirect name, per nom. Kierzek (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.