Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Brain Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small Brain Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a small independent record label, with a slight advertorial tint and no evidence of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:CORPDEPTH. As always, every record label does not automatically get a Wikipedia article just because its own web presence verifies that it exists -- it needs to be the subject of enough media coverage to pass a sourceability standard, but there's no such coverage being shown here at all. Bearcat (talk) 18:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a ton of redlinks, no claims of notability, and no secondary references. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.