Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snapped Ankles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 20:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snapped Ankles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A speedy was declined because they are 'associated with a notable label' (hardly blue note or Stiff) & that there are sources. Flavy sources imo. Theis is a bunch of non-notable wannabees. And post-punk?? Punk ceased to be interesting thirty snecking years ago. TheLongTone (talk) 14:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fail all WP:BIO, however NOT Anough significant coverage on wikipedia multiple sources , i mean Reliably sources. Samat lib (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. They had a session broadcast on Marc Riley's BBC 6 Music show ([1]), and have received enough coverage, e.g. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. I would expect most of the UK music mags to review the album (released today), and likely one or two broadsheets over the weekend. --Michig (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Michig's findings; coverage exists on the subject in reliable sources. gongshow talk 06:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: their album Come Play the Trees has been reviewed in the October 2017 issue of Mojo. Richard3120 (talk) 23:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Another album review: [7]. --Michig (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.