Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snehapriya Roy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Sources cannot be assumed, they must be specified. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snehapriya Roy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So called beauty queen featuring only in blogs and similar non-RS references. Article looks very good, thanks to the probable WP:SPA who has been creating similar articles on non-notable beauty pageants and their winners. Delete, fails WP:GNG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing much in the way of secondary sources. — Cirt (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no secondary sources, my searches turn up nothing. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:51, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems notable enough. I'm sure sources can be found. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sources cannot be alleged to exist, especially for a BLP, they must be demonstrated to exist. There are only six G-News hits, all of them fleeting mentions, and zero newspaper hits, a dire result for the gigantic Indian English-language press. None of the sources presented in the article are reliable. Beyond that, this "Miss Intercontinental" pageant is a minor one that only scrapes by on notability itself; we're not talking Miss Universe here. Ravenswing 06:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.