Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snippy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snippy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF. No new examples provided in the 11 years given to provide new examples. The coverage of what Al Gore said is about what Al Gore said, not the word snippy. wumbolo ^^^ 18:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This looks like a WP:COATRACK for the Gore/Bush anecdote; it contains virtually nothing on snippy-ness per se. Redirecting is not really an option, since the word is marginally related to Irritability, but this title also relates marginally to Snip (disambiguation). Cnilep (talk) 03:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom.TH1980 (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.