Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoGoSurvey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SoGoSurvey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Online survey software company does not appear to meet the notability criteria for web content or organizations. Current sources in the article are PR or come from the organization's own website. An attempt to find reviews of the product or their organization in reliable sources was unsuccessful. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 05:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Avono♂ (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software/web article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. A search turned up blog coverage including [1] but no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.