Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoLLUMINATI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SoLLUMINATI

SoLLUMINATI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, a BEFORE search actually worse results than what's in the article. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources are a mix of unreliable/primary sources while others are a mention or not enough coverage. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 00:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoLLUMINATI, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.