Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Desktop
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Social Desktop
- Social Desktop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems rather obscure and not all that notable. Needs a pretty extensive rewrite to even become sort of encyclopedic, and hasn't had a single news blurb or update for the last 8 years. Karunamon ✉ 04:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Wow, I'm thinking I should have just PROD'd this one. I've never seen an AfD go this long without a single third party comment.Karunamon ✉ 15:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete never caught on enough to meet notability level. As for above, not surprising: there are few volunteers given the number of junk articles on software on WIkipedia, sigh. W Nowicki (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 02:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 02:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be nothing more than an interesting idea for using existing software that never caught on. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.