Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftTalk Messenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SoftTalk Messenger

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources are routine reporting, mostly copy-paste from press releases and marketing material, with little or no independent reporting. MarioGom (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Likely UPE spam. Fails WP:NCORP Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — per MarioGom and Timtrent possible UPE article that fails to meet WP:NCORP. Celestina007 (talk) 22:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very little in the way of independent content. Sources found are based almost entirely on material or comments from people working for the company behind this software. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.